Explicit Material Borders on Sexual Misconduct
The article was picked up by talk show host Lars Larson’s producer, Donovan Sargent, who then contacted me for an interview. The image shown to students on the Zoom class was a collage of young naked women with a partner, lying prone, on their bellies, with painful expressions on their faces. The images were inappropriately suggestive to match the content. What 14 year old does not understand what pain is anyway, unless they are taught BDSM is good.
You would say we are making this up..not so! in July 15, 2014 article, Pro-life organization Live Action introduced another investigative video exposing Planned Parenthood’s disturbing practice of advising young girls about dangerous sex activities such as bondage/discipline and sadomasochistic sex (BDSM).
The investigations are part of Live Action’s series titled “SexEd: Planned Parenthood’s Dangerous Sex Advice for Kids.”
The latest exposé features the abortion giant’s facilities in Denver, Colorado. In the video, counselors offer suggestions to the undercover investigators, in graphic detail, of a spectrum of sadistic sexual behaviors, including “whipping,” “tying up,” and “asphyxiation.”
As the video shows, a gruesome crime involving asphyxiation was recently in the media. In January, police discovered 16-year-old Jessica Burlew with the corpse of 43-year-old Jason Ash, whom Burlew had strangled to death and mutilated with razor blades in the midst of “a sex game.”
A site for Planned Parenthood of Hudson Peconic also contains information about a seminar for educators called “50 Shades of Safe,” which seeks to explain “how a BDSM relationship is successfully navigated between sexual partners.”
But why should we be surprised when public schools’ only caution for students sexual encounters is mutual consent, and all forms of sexual experimentation is encouraged for students to know what they prefer in a partner, and who they really are!
Are there exemptions for exposing children to obscenity?
President Ronald Reagan formed a Commission to study the serious effects of obscenity and child pornography in our Nation. In 1984 he signed legislation isolating child pornography as a uniquely tragic and distinct criminal offense. Now, our children are being exposed to pornography in a very different way. Comprehensive Sexuality Education now taught in K-12 classrooms is a far cry from the “health’ classes of the 1980’s. Graphic descriptions of all forms of sexual activities are made available to students, not only via curriculum but recommended websites. Pornography is offered as a means of “safe sex.”
In other words, it is now legal for a teacher to display obscene materials to minors without parental knowledge or consent. This same legislation has been passed in 43 states giving educators free reign to peddle materials to students that would otherwise be illegal if an adult showed them to another’s minor child.
Is this really education?
Parents’ Rights In Education is against this comprehensive approach to sexuality, because students are taught to engage in risky behavior, usually without parents’ knowledge. We advocate for an OPT-IN policy only, with parent consent.
The unintended silver lining for the school shutdowns is parents are now far more aware of curriculum content. Parents are un-enrolling their children from public school and seeking alternatives!
DONATE TODAY!
www.ParentsRightsInEducation.com